I wasn't implying almost any of the things you just wrote. I also don't see how what I wrote was rude at all, but that's a matter of opinion.

So you are implying that any one in a lower class, let's say lower than you (because surely there are higher than you) are unsuccessful because of their money management?

Where did I imply this? No, I don't think that. It's hard to go further because I don't know where you got this from. I've only implied that people tend to stay in the same economic class they were raised in, which is true.

I on the other hand have met many happy people who have little to no money.

As have I. Nowhere did I even bring this up.

Also, if you are implying that it is abnormal for parents to take any step in their child's life to help them, and no this doesn't have to include money. Then search parenting please.

I simply pointed out that not everyone has that luxury. I didn't say it was bad or abnormal. I even conceded that I may have taken advantage of such help if it had been available to me.

By the way, you're the one that splits the friendship between the poor and the wealthy, not me. I am capable of meeting many backgrounds with ease.

It's not a conscious split, but it still happens for most people. To begin with, you're mostly only exposed to people in your own economic class (you work around them and live near them), so most of your friends will naturally come from that pool. But you also can relate more easily to people in your own economic class for various reasons. None of this is malicious; it's just how it is.

I think you interpreted my post in a completely different manner than I intended.